Fiscally responsible reforms for students, workers and retirees.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Alexa Marrero
VETO THREAT on H.R. 5522
Stunted regulatory process “unrealistic” and “fails to provide assurance of improved worker safety”
Later today, the House is expected to vote on the Combustible Dust Explosion and Fire Prevention Act (H.R. 5522). Because of the “expedited and one-size-fits-all regulatory approach required by the bill,” the Office of Management and Budget has issued a Statement of Administration Policy indicating that if the bill were presented to the President in its current form, his senior advisors would recommend that it be vetoed.
As the SAP notes, H.R. 5522 will impact as many as 200,000 workplaces with its cumbersome new mandates. And notwithstanding statements of the bill’s sponsors, major grain and feed industry leaders have expressed serious concern about the bill’s potential creation of costly and duplicative new mandates that threaten to drive up the cost of food.
There is a better way to protect workers. Later today, Republicans will offer a substitute that calls for a more comprehensive approach to protecting workers from the hazards of combustible dust by taking all relevant information into account and including input and expertise from affected stakeholders.
H.R. 5522 has drawn widespread opposition from the industries that would be hampered by its hurried new regulatory mandates, as well as the agency whose responsibility it would be to implement and enforce. We urge you to join us in voting NO on this unworkable end-run around workplace safety rulemaking, and instead support a more comprehensive approach to protecting workers. For more information, please contact the Education and Labor Committee Republican staff at x5-7101.
Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (R-CA)
Senior Republican Member
Education and Labor Committee
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
April 29, 2008
The Administration strongly opposes House passage of H.R. 5522, which would require the Secretary of Labor to issue interim and final occupational safety and health standards regarding worker exposure to combustible dust. The Administration recognizes the hazards of combustible dust in the workplace and is committed to protecting American workers from exposure to such hazards. The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) currently enforces seventeen standards that collectively provide protections against combustible dust hazards. The Administration has serious concerns with the expedited and one-size-fits-all regulatory approach required by the bill, which will impact as many as 200,000 workplaces in a variety of industries throughout the United States. If H.R. 5522 were presented to the President, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.
H.R. 5522 requires OSHA to promulgate an interim final rule (IFR) to regulate combustible dusts within ninety days of enactment and a final rule within 18 months of enactment. This regulatory approach is unrealistic in that it does not allow for sufficient stakeholder review and input, does not provide sufficient time to conduct a thorough economic analysis, and ultimately fails to provide assurance of improved worker safety. These procedures exist, in part, to gather the necessary information to help produce strong and thorough regulations that effectively protect employees, and ensure that rules are clear, effective, and enforceable. Eighteen months is insufficient time to consider the difficult issues related to combustible dust and fulfill all of the procedural and statutory obligations for OSHA rulemakings, especially given the large diversity of industries being regulated and the impracticality of a one-size-fits-all approach for a hazard that manifests itself differently in each industry.
Finally, H.R. 5522 requires that employers comply with the IFR within 30 days of enactment. This provision does not provide employers sufficient time to implement the new requirements and does not give OSHA enough time to adequately train its compliance officers or develop inspection procedures to enforce these requirements.